"Straw vetoes Iraq minutes release"

[rhythmaning]

From the BBC just now:

Justice Secretary Jack Straw has vetoed the publication of minutes of key Cabinet meetings held in the run-up to the Iraq war in 2003.

He said he would use a clause in the Freedom of Information Act to block the release of details of meetings in which the war's legality was discussed.

Releasing the papers would do "serious damage" to Cabinet government, he said, and outweighed public interest needs.

The Information Tribunal ruled last month that they should be published.

They had rejected a government appeal against the Information Commissioner's ruling that the papers be published because decisions taken in the run-up to 2003 invasion of Iraq were "momentous" and controversial.

The government could have appealed against the Information Tribunal's decision in the High Court, but has decided instead to use the ministerial veto for the first time since the Freedom of Information laws came into force.

This seems incredibly hypocritical from a government that came to power claiming to be in favour of openness.

Comments

[chickenfeet2003.livejournal.com]

All politicians are in favour of "openess" right up to the point where the truth is inconvenient or, as might be the case here, would see them on the next plane to The Hague.

[rhythmaning.livejournal.com]

Much as I dislike my cynicism, I must admit I think you are right!

[hano.livejournal.com]

And the whole rotten lot of them really should be in the Hague. I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that a revolution is going to be needed to get rid of them.