rhythmaning (
rhythmaning) wrote2006-12-12 06:01 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Anonymity.
When I started writing this journal, I was moderately concerned about anonymity. We all know the internet is a scary, scary place, after all.
So I think I followed
frankie_ecap’s form of using people’s initials to protect their identity. (I think she had her own reasons and habits for doing this, and it seemed to work.) Even the cats...
There are some people I asked explicitly if I could use their name – their first name – for specific posts. (I tend to ask friends if I am posting something about them which might be private, as well.) Whenever I have done this, they’ve been happy about it.
I was thinking about this today. I was having lunch with three people who are former colleagues (and whom three people on my flist know; but two of those haven’t wandered by in the last six months). And I was thinking about writing something about it – and juggling with four different initials. It just didn’t work for me.
I reckon that I may well start using first names for people I see, just because it is easier. I can’t see that it causes any harm, and it may make sense – and even help.
I’ll stick with LJ user names anytime I write anything about someone with an LJ account (but hey, I may not even know!); but otherwise, I’ll just stick to first names. So, so much easier.
So I think I followed
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
There are some people I asked explicitly if I could use their name – their first name – for specific posts. (I tend to ask friends if I am posting something about them which might be private, as well.) Whenever I have done this, they’ve been happy about it.
I was thinking about this today. I was having lunch with three people who are former colleagues (and whom three people on my flist know; but two of those haven’t wandered by in the last six months). And I was thinking about writing something about it – and juggling with four different initials. It just didn’t work for me.
I reckon that I may well start using first names for people I see, just because it is easier. I can’t see that it causes any harm, and it may make sense – and even help.
I’ll stick with LJ user names anytime I write anything about someone with an LJ account (but hey, I may not even know!); but otherwise, I’ll just stick to first names. So, so much easier.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I do like the semi-anonymity I get on-line, but am pretty lazy about extending it to friends who aren't on line.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I try to be sensitive to other people's anonymity requirements, as I can imagine how frustrating it would be to be "outed" accidentally or not!
no subject
If I'm being rude I give them a full first name that's like their real name.
I never use LJ people's real names in here and I try not to add much identifying detail, partly beause in identifying other people you sort of identify yourself.
What's weird is describing to an offline person what an LJ friend said that was funny/amusing/sad. In that case I'll use their real name, not their LJ name, but I struggle to remember because some of my best LJ friends are more their pseudonym than their real name, if you see what I mean.
And honestly, referring to
Oops.