Date: 2006-12-04 11:39 am (UTC)
I saw this post in my caffeine crazed deadline panic last week, and thought, 'I'll have to chip my two guineas in there when I get a moment.'

Still don't have a moment, but then when will I ever?

Scottish Independence is one of those emotional decisions things that isn't subject to a rational analysis - you either believe in it or don't. Once you've picked a side, you can start picking arguments.

One of mine, although not the original impetus, was the situation throughout the 80's and 90's when Scotland voted repeatedly Labour and got Thatcher. It didn't take long to realise that the Scottish government would always be decided by the English, and that if we wanted a govenment that favoured, say, no tuition fees and government sponsored personal care for the elderly over, say, tax breaks for private health care and education for them what could afford it, then it might be a good idea to have our own Parliament.

Labour's problem is that every success of the Parliament makes the case for independence stronger. And, largely due to Labour, it has been a qualified success.

For what it's worth, I'm sure Labour would be the natural party of government in an independent Scotland. I'm also interested in seeing how the party would handle that - a party founded on International Socialism shouldn't have a problem with having international memberships.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

rhythmaning: (Default)
rhythmaning

June 2017

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 21st, 2025 06:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios